If PDF does not display, click here to download

1
Ädel, A. (2021). Reflections on Reflexivity in Digital Communication: Towards a Third Wave of Metadiscourse Studies. In L. D'Angelo, A. Mauranen, & S. Maci (Eds.), Metadiscourse in Digital Communication: New Research, Approaches and Methodologies (pp. 37-64). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85814-8_3 Google Scholar ›
2
Al Badi, I. A. H. (2015). Academic writing difficulties of ESL learners. The 2015 WEI international academic conference proceedings, Barcelona. Google Scholar ›
3
Amanollahzadeh, M., Taqavi, H., Khaleghkhah, A., & Roshani, H. (2024). Predicting students' attitudes towards academic writing based on patterns of scientific help-seeking and academic optimism. Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 58(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22059/jlib.2024.375674.1738 Google Scholar ›
4
Bagheri, F., & Deng, L. (2019). Personal and Social Voices in Written Discourse Revisited. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 42(3), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2019-0021 Google Scholar ›
5
Bhatti, N., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2020). A review of research on student self-assessment in second / foreign language writing. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 15(2), 125-151. Google Scholar ›
6
Bird, B. (2013). A Basic Writing Course Design to Promote Writer Identity: Three Analyses of Student Papers. Journal of Basic Writing, 32(1), 62-96. Google Scholar ›
7
Birjandi, P., & Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2012). The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 513-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.549204 Google Scholar ›
8
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Google Scholar ›
9
Broda, M., Ekholm, E., & Zumbrunn, S. (2020). Assessing the Predictive Nature of Teacher and Student Writing Self-Regulation Discrepancy. Frontline Learning Research, 8(4), 52-73. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i4.505 Google Scholar ›
10
Bustrum, B. J. (2001). Language and power in the ESL classroom Grand Valley State University]. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/theses/602 Google Scholar ›
11
Cameron, J., Nairn, K., & Higgins, J. (2009). Demystifying Academic Writing: Reflections on Emotions, Know-How and Academic Identity. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260902734943 Google Scholar ›
12
Canagarajah, A. S. (2015). “Blessed in my own way:” Pedagogical affordances for dialogical voice construction in multilingual student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.001 Google Scholar ›
13
Castelló, M., & Iñesta, A. (2012). Texts as Artifacts-in-Activity: Developing Authorial Identity and Academic Voice in Writing Academic Research Papers. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University Writing: Selves and Texts in Academic Societies (Volume 24 ed., pp. 179-200). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1572-6304(2012)0000024014 Google Scholar ›
14
Castelló, M., Iñesta, A., Pardo, M., Liesa, E., & Martínez-Fernández, R. (2012). Tutoring the end-of-studies dissertation: helping psychology students find their academic voice when revising academic texts. Higher Education, 63(1), 97-115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41343608 Google Scholar ›
15
Cavaleri, M., Kawaguchi, S., Di Biase, B., & Power, C. (2019). How recorded audio-visual feedback can improve academic language support. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.16.4.6 Google Scholar ›
16
Chand, Z. A. (2014). Language learning strategy use and its impact on proficiency in academic writing of tertiary students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 511-521. https://ac.els-cdn.com/S1877042814016000/1-s2.0-S1877042814016000-main.pdf?_tid=7d0001ae-b8a4-11e7-9487-00000aab0f01&acdnat=1508840407_33abfe28ec75009bd65258a53f37bd19 Google Scholar ›
17
Chang, P. (2010). Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Inductive learning for second language writers using a stance corpus University of Michigan]. Michigan. Google Scholar ›
18
Chang, P. (2012). Using a stance corpus to learn about effective authorial stance-taking: a textlinguistic approach. ReCALL, 24(2), 209-236. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344012000079 Google Scholar ›
19
Chang, P., & Schleppegerell, M. (2011). Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.005 Google Scholar ›
20
Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English Language Learning and Technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.7 Google Scholar ›
21
Chen, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Assessing student-writers’ self-efficacy beliefs about text revision in EFL writing. Assessing Writing, 40, 27-41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.002 Google Scholar ›
22
Cheng, G. (2017). The impact of online automated feedback on students' reflective journal writing in an EFL course. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 18-27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.002 Google Scholar ›
23
Chesser-Smyth, P. A., & Long, T. (2013). Understanding the influences on self-confidence among first-year undergraduate nursing students in Ireland. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(1), 145-157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06001.x Google Scholar ›
24
Cheung, K. Y. F., Stupple, E. J. N., & Elander, J. (2017). Development and validation of the Student Attitudes and Beliefs about Authorship Scale: a psychometrically robust measure of authorial identity. Studies in Higher Education, 42(1), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1034673 Google Scholar ›
25
Chicho, K. Z. H., & Zrary, M. O. H. (2022). Using Visual Media for Improving Writing Skills. Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 2(4), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v2i4.55 Google Scholar ›
26
Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., & Saricaoglu, A. (2016). Causal discourse analyzer: improving automated feedback on academic ESL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 494-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.991795 Google Scholar ›
27
Chung, H. Q., Chen, V., & Olson, C. B. (2021). The impact of self-assessment, planning and goal setting, and reflection before and after revision on student self-efficacy and writing performance. Reading and Writing, 34(7), 1885-1913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10186-x Google Scholar ›
28
Chung, S. J. (2019). The Role of Self-reflective Essays in ESL Writing Portfolio. Korean Journal of General Education, 13(6), 315-332. https://j-kagedu.or.kr/m/journal/view.php?number=814# Google Scholar ›
29
Dakuidreketi, M. R. (2014). Scientific Method and Advent of Literacy: towards Understanding Itaukei and Indo-Fijian School Students’ Differential Achievement in Science. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 99 - 109. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020201 Google Scholar ›
30
Daniel, B. K., & Harland, T. (2017). Higher Education Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide to the Research Process. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315149783 Google Scholar ›
31
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2016). Language, Identity, and Investment in the Twenty-first Century. In T. McCarty & S. May (Eds.), Language Policy and Political Issues in Education (3 ed., pp. 1-15). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02320-5_18-1 Google Scholar ›
32
Dastjerdi, H. V., & Shirzad, M. (2010). The Impact of Explicit Instruction of Metadiscourse Markers on EFL Learner's Writing Performance. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 2(2), 155-174. https://tesl.shirazu.ac.ir/article_412_3ff92424e54a9bc14d442f961e6285dd.pdf Google Scholar ›
33
Davis, M., & Morley, J. (2018). Facilitating learning about academic phraseology: teaching activities for student writers. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, October(Special Edition: 2018 ALDinHE Conference). Google Scholar ›
34
Davis, M., & Morley, J. (2022). ‘It can facilitate so much!’ Student writers’ practice of self-efficacy to develop their use of formulaic phrases. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education(24). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi24.856 Google Scholar ›
35
DiPardo, A., Storms, B. A., & Selland, M. (2011). Seeing voices: Assessing writerly stance in the NWP Analytic Writing Continuum. Assessing Writing, 16(3), 170-188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2011.01.003 Google Scholar ›
36
Dubey, A. D. (2021). Evaluation of Students’ Perception of Virtual Learning in Fiji during COVID-19. Retrieved 28 October 2023, from Google Scholar ›
37
Elander, J., Cheung, K., & Stupple, E. (2017). How can universities help students avoid plagiarism? Learning and Teaching Conference, Buxton. Google Scholar ›
38
Elander, J., Pittam, G., Lusher, J., Fox, P., & Payne, N. (2010). Evaluation of an intervention to help students avoid unintentional plagiarism by improving their authorial identity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802687745 Google Scholar ›
39
Ellery, K. (2008). Undergraduate plagiarism: a pedagogical perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698918 Google Scholar ›
40
Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023). AI-generated feedback on writing: insights into efficacy and ENL student preference. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2 Google Scholar ›
41
Fangzhi, H. (2020). Identity Construction in Academic Writing of Student Writers Who Use English as an Additional Language: A Literature Review. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43(4), 506-524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2020-0033 Google Scholar ›
42
Fernández, L. C., & Escobar, C. F. (2018). EFL Learners’ Development of Voice In Academic Writing: Lexical bundles, Boosters/Hedges and Stance-taking Strategies. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal(15), 96-124. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.392 Google Scholar ›
43
Fife, J. (2018). Can I Say 'I' in My Paper?: Teaching Metadiscourse to Develop International Writers' Authority and Disciplinary Expertise. Across the Disciplines, 15(1), 61-70. http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/internationalizing_wac/fife2018.pdf Google Scholar ›
44
Finn, H. B. (2018). Articulating struggle: ESL students’ perceived obstacles to success in a community college writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 101-106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.001 Google Scholar ›
45
Fogal, G. G. (2015). Pedagogical Stylistics and Concept-based Instruction: An Investigation into the Development of Voice in the Academic Writing of Japanese University Students of English University of Toronto]. Toronto. Google Scholar ›
46
Geng, Y., & Wharton, S. (2016). Evaluative language in discussion sections of doctoral theses: Similarities and differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 80-91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.001 Google Scholar ›
47
Gennrich, T., & Dison, L. (2018). Voice matters: Students’ struggle to find voice. Reading & Writing, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v9i1.173 Google Scholar ›
48
Giridharan, B. (2012). Identifying Gaps in Academic Writing of ESL Students. US-China education review, 2(6), 578-587. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/4402 Google Scholar ›
49
Goundar, P. R. (2019). Key Emerging Issues in Higher Education, Fiji. Asian Social Science, 15(6), 96-100. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v15n6p96 Google Scholar ›
50
Goundar, P. R. (2023). Underlying Educational Inequalities in the Global and Fijian Context. Open Education Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/edu-2022-0192 Google Scholar ›
51
Goundar, P. R., & Bogitini, L. J. K. D. (2019). First Year Fijian Undergraduate University Students Academic Essay Writing Error Analysis. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 8(1), 172-177. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.1p.172 Google Scholar ›
52
Gray, G. C. (2017). Academic Voice in Scholarly Writing. The Qualitative Report, 22(1), 179-196. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol22/iss1/10 Google Scholar ›
53
Guerin, C., & Picard, M. (2012). Try it on: Voice, concordancing and text-matching in doctoral writing. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 8(2), 34-45. Google Scholar ›
54
Han, Y., Zhao, S., & Ng, L.-L. (2021). How Technology Tools Impact Writing Performance, Lexical Complexity, and Perceived Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in EFL Academic Writing: A Comparative Study [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752793 Google Scholar ›
55
Hasan, M. A., Noor, N., Abdul-Rahman, S.-S., & Rahman, M. (2020). The Transition From Intelligent to Affective Tutoring System: A Review and Open Issues. IEEE Access, 8, 204612-204638. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036990 Google Scholar ›
56
Helms-Park, R., & Stapleton, P. (2003). Questioning the importance of individualized voice in undergraduate L2 argumentative writing: An empirical study with pedagogical implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 245-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.001 Google Scholar ›
57
Herrenkohl, L. R., & Cornelius, L. (2013). Investigating elementary students' scientific and historical argumentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 413-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.799475 Google Scholar ›
58
Hirvela, A., & Belcher, D. (2001). Coming back to voice: The multiple voices and identities of mature multilingual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 83-106. Google Scholar ›
59
Hopf, S. C., McDonagh, S. H., Wang, C., & McLeod, S. (2019). English language and literacy proficiency of students in an urban Fiji primary school. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(2), 223 - 238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1541999 Google Scholar ›
60
Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400103 Google Scholar ›
61
Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8 Google Scholar ›
62
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 Google Scholar ›
63
Hyland, K. (2012). Individuality or conformity? Identity in personal and university academic homepages. Computers and Composition, 29(4), 309-322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2012.10.002 Google Scholar ›
64
Jarkas, N., & Fakhreddine, J. (2017). The dance of voices: A study on academic writing at AUB. In L. R. Arnold, A. Nebel, & L. Ronesi (Eds.), Emerging writing research from the Middle East-North African region (pp. 241-263). The WAC Clearinghouose and University Press of Colorado. https://wac.colostate.edu/books/mena/chapter11.pdf Google Scholar ›
65
Johnson, I. (2007). Empowering first-year composition students through digital rhetoric The University of Georgia]. Athens. Google Scholar ›
66
Kaur, M., & Prasad, S. (2017). The Future Demands of Education in Fijian Classrooms. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(3), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2203015458 Google Scholar ›
67
Kessler, M. (2023). Supplementing mobile-assisted language learning with reflective journal writing: A case study of Duolingo users’ metacognitive awareness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(5-6), 1040-1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1968914 Google Scholar ›
68
Khalsa, G. K. (2015). Dialogical classroom processes in remediation of writing self-efficacy, epistemic beliefs, and academic identity in underprepared college freshmen University of South Alabama]. Alabama. Google Scholar ›
69
Kirkpatrick, A. (2017). How important is argument? Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 81-82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.006 Google Scholar ›
70
Knight, S., Shibani, A., Abel, S., Gibson, A., Ryan, P., Sutton, N., Wight, R., Luca, C., Sándor, Á., Kitto, K., Liu, M., Mogarkar, R. V., & Shum, S. B. (2020). AcaWriter: A Learning Analytics Tool for Formative Feedback on Academic Writing. Journal of Writing Research, 12(1), 141-186. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.06 Google Scholar ›
71
Kumar, B. A., & Mohite, P. (2017). Usability Study of Mobile Learning Application in Higher Education Context: An Example from Fiji National University. In A. Murphy, H. Farley, L. E. Dyson, & H. Jones (Eds.), Mobile Learning in Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Harnessing Trends and Challenging Orthodoxies (pp. 607-622). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4944-6_29 Google Scholar ›
72
Lancaster, Z. (2014). Making Stance Explicit for Second Language Writers in the Disciplines: What Faculty Need to Know about the Language of Stancetaking. In T. M. Zawacki & M. Cox (Eds.), WAC and Second-Language Writers: Research Towards Linguistically and Culturally Inclusive Programs and Practices. The WAC Clearinghouse. Google Scholar ›
73
Lancaster, Z. (2016). Expressing stance in undergraduate writing: Discipline-specific and general qualities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.006 Google Scholar ›
74
Lea, M., & Jones, S. (2011). Digital literacies in higher education: Exploring textual and technological practice. Studies in Higher Education, 36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003664021 Google Scholar ›
75
Lee, J. J., & Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 21-34. Google Scholar ›
76
Lee, J. S. Y., Cheung, E. L. M., Saberi, D., & Webster, J. J. (2019). Expanding students’ registerial repertoire with a writing assistance tool. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100777 Google Scholar ›
77
Lehman, I. M., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2020). Representation of voice in English essays of non-native students of business. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1712221 Google Scholar ›
78
Levy, M., & Moore, P. (2018). Qualitative Research in CALL. Language, Learning and Technology, 22, 1-7. Google Scholar ›
79
Lillis, T. (2003). Student writing as 'academic literacies': Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design, language and education. Language and Education, 17(3), 192-207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666848 Google Scholar ›
80
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x Google Scholar ›
81
MacIntyre, R. (2019). The Use of Personal Pronouns in the Writing of Argumentative Essays by EFL Writers. RELC Journal, 50(1), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217730139 Google Scholar ›
82
Maguire, M., Everitt-Reynolds, A., & Delahunt, B. (2013). Self-efficacy in academic reading and writing, authorial identity and learning strategies in first-year students. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (AISHE-J), 5(1), 11111 - 11117. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305335746_Self-efficacy_in_academic_reading_and_writing_authorial_identity_and_learning_strategies_in_first-year_students Google Scholar ›
83
Matsuda, P. K., & Tardy, C. (2007). Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes - ENGL SPECIF PURP, 26, 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001 Google Scholar ›
84
Matsuov, E., Smith, M., Soslau, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & von Duyke, K. (2016). Dialogic Education for and from Authorial Agency. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 4. https://doi.org/doi:10.5195/dpj.2016.172 Google Scholar ›
85
Mazdayasna, G., & Zaini, A. (2015). The Effect of Collaborative Prewriting Discussions on L2 Writing Development and Learners’ Identity Construction. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-164. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijal.18.2.141 Google Scholar ›
86
Mohammed, D. A. M. A. (2019). Using A Weblog-Oriented Program for Promoting English Majors' Academic Writing and Authorial Identity. Journal of Research in Education and Psychology, 34(2), 515-566. https://doi.org/10.21608/mathj.2019.82058 Google Scholar ›
87
Mohan, B. A. (2011). Qualitative Research Methods in Second Language Assessment. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second language Teaching and Learning (Vol. 2, pp. 752 - 767). Routledge. Google Scholar ›
88
Nelson, N., & Castelló, M. (2012). Academic Writing and Authorial Voice. Studies in Writing, 24, 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1572-6304(2012)0000024007 Google Scholar ›
89
Nielsen, K. (2014). Self-assessment methods in writing instruction: a conceptual framework, successful practices and essential strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01533.x Google Scholar ›
90
Nourinezhad, S., Hadipourfard, E., & Bavali, M. (2021). The Effect of Audio-visual Feedback on Academic Writing Task Procrastination. Teaching English Language, 15(2), 173-200. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2021.142155 Google Scholar ›
91
Nsanja, G. W. (2018). Becoming academic writers: Author Identity in a Malawian University University of Leeds]. Leeds. Google Scholar ›
92
O'Dowd, I. (2019, October). "A little muddled and in need of greater clarity": Encouraging formative use of the Academic Writing Toolkit OOFHEC2019: the Online, Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference, UNED, Madrid. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337190557_A_little_muddled_and_in_need_of_greater_clarity_encouraging_formative_use_of_the_Academic_Writing_Toolkit Google Scholar ›
93
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220 Google Scholar ›
94
Okyere, E., Salusalu, M., Goundar, R., & Marfoh, K. (2023). Online teaching during COVID-19 pandemic in Fiji: challenges, facilitators and improvement strategies. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(1), 62-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-03-2022-0041 Google Scholar ›
95
Olivier, A. P. (2017). Negotiating agency through authorial voice in thesis writing. In S. Carter & D. Laurs (Eds.), Giving Feedback on Research Writing: A Handbook for Supervisors and Advisors (pp. 198-203). Routledge. Google Scholar ›
96
Petrić, B. (2010). Students' conceptions of voice in academic writing Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. In R. Lorés-Sanz, P. Mur-Duenas, & E. Lafuente-Millán (Eds.), Constructing interpersonality: Multiple perspectives and applications to written academic genres (pp. 325-336). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Google Scholar ›
97
Prat-Sala, M., & Redford, P. (2012). Writing essays: does self-efficacy matter? The relationship between self-efficacy in reading and in writing and undergraduate students’ performance in essay writing. Educational Psychology, 32(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.621411 Google Scholar ›
98
Puertas, T. H. (2018). Teacher's feedback vs. computer-generated feedback: A focus on articles. Language Value, 10(1), 67 - 88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2018.10.5 Google Scholar ›
99
Rahnuma, N. (2023). Exploring ESL students’ experiences of academic writing in higher education- a cultural historical activity theory perspective. Education Inquiry. Retrieved 29 October 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2222450 Google Scholar ›
100
Ravana, V., Taib, R., & Junit, J. (2023). Exploring Tertiary Level ESL Students’ Perspectives of Using Self-Assessment for Academic Writing: A Conceptual Paper. Development in Language Studies, 3(2), 23-29. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/periodicals/index.php/dils/article/view/13961 Google Scholar ›
101
Read, B., Francis, B., & Robson, J. (2001). 'Playing Safe': Undergraduate essay writing and the presentation of the student 'voice'. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(3), 387-399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690124289 Google Scholar ›
102
Salkind, N. J. (Ed.). (2010). Encyclopedia of Research Design (Vol. 3). SAGE Publications Ltd. Google Scholar ›
103
Sameer, M. (2014). Towards understanding the diversity of English for Academic Purposes students at the University of the South Pacific University of Technology]. Sydney. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/30325/2/02whole.pdf Google Scholar ›
104
Saricaoglu, A. (2019). The impact of automated feedback on L2 learners’ written causal explanations. ReCALL : the Journal of EUROCALL, 31(2), 189-203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401800006X Google Scholar ›
105
Shengmo, W. (2022). The Impact of Power Distance on Classroom Equity in Second Language Teaching in a Cross-Cultural Communicative Context. Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Modern Management and Education Technology (MMET 2022), Google Scholar ›
106
Simonovic, B., Vione, K. C., Fido, D., Stupple, E. J., Martin, J., & Clarke, R. (2022). The Impact of Attitudes, Beliefs, and Cognitive Reflection on the Development of Critical Thinking Skills in Online Students. Online Learning, 26(2), 254-274. Google Scholar ›
107
Singh, J. K., Daniel, B. K., & Koh, J. H. L. (2023). Ghost in the Machine: AVATAR, a Prototype for Supporting Student Authorial Voice. In N. Wang, G. Rebolledo-Mendez, V. Dimitrova, N. Matsuda, & O. C. Santos (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky. AIED 2023. (pp. 504-509). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_78 Google Scholar ›
108
Stapleton, P. (2017). Ability to argue: Rooted in nature. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 83-84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.007 Google Scholar ›
109
Stock, I., & Eik-Nes, N. L. (2016). Voice features in academic texts – A review of empirical studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.006 Google Scholar ›
110
Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2018). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies. Computers & Education, 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005 Google Scholar ›
111
Taber, K. S. (2017). The Role of New Educational Technology in Teaching and Learning: A Constructivist Perspective on Digital Learning. In A. Marcus-Quinn & T. Hourigan (Eds.), Handbook on Digital Learning for K-12 Schools (pp. 397-412). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33808-8_24 Google Scholar ›
112
Tent, J. (2004). Lexical borrowing in Fiji English. In P. Geraghty & J. Tent (Eds.), Borrowing: A Pacific Perspective (Vol. 548, pp. 307 - 330). Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University. Google Scholar ›
113
Tokalauvere, M. (2008). Exploring Home and School Factors Affecting the Performance of Form 7 Fijian Students University of the South Pacific]. Suva. Google Scholar ›
114
Tseng, C., & Huh, K. (2019). Autonomy in Learning English as a foreign Language : A Case Study in Writer's Voice. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 16(4), 1432-1439. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.27.1432 Google Scholar ›
115
Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational Design Research (First ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088364. Google Scholar ›
116
Viete, R., & Le Ha, P. (2007). The growth of voice: Expanding possibilities for representing self in research writing. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 39-57. Google Scholar ›
117
Walsh, M. J. (2018). Unpacking Students’ Writer Identity in the Transition from High School to College: A Mixed Methods Study Virginia Commonwealth University]. Richmond, Virginia. Google Scholar ›
118
Ware, P. (2011). Computer-Generated Feedback on Student Writing. TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 769-774. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.272525 Google Scholar ›
119
Yang, A., Stockwell, S., & McDonnell, L. (2019). Writing in your own voice: An intervention that reduces plagiarism and common writing problems in students' scientific writing. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21282 Google Scholar ›
120
Yoon, H.-J. (2017). Textual voice elements and voice strength in EFL argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 32, 72-84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.02.002 Google Scholar ›
121
Yoon, H.-J., & Abdi Tabari, M. (2023). Authorial voice in source-based and opinion-based argumentative writing: Patterns of voice across task types and proficiency levels. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 62, 101228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101228 Google Scholar ›
122
Yoon, H.-J., & Römer, U. (2020). Quantifying Disciplinary Voices: An Automated Approach to Interactional Metadiscourse in Successful Student Writing. Written Communication, 37(2), 208-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319898672 Google Scholar ›
123
Zhang, L., & Wang, J. (2023). To be like a "scholar": a study on the construction of authorial identity of Chinese EFL learners in academic writing: an intertextuality perspective. Front Psychol, 14, 1297557. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1297557 Google Scholar ›
124
Zhang, X. (2019). Exploring the relationship between college students’ writing anxiety and the pedagogical use of online resources. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0149-y Google Scholar ›
125
Zhao, C. G. (2013). Measuring authorial voice strength in L2 argumentative writing: The development and validation of an analytic rubric. Language Testing, 30(2), 201-230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212456965 Google Scholar ›
126
Zhu, P. (2022). Cultural Influence on ESL Students’ Writing. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5, 168-175. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.12.21 Google Scholar ›

No related articles.

Factors influencing post-use ESL authorial confidence for new authorial voice learning technology